September 12, 2012
The short story called “The Man in
the Well” by Ira Sher was definitely eye catching. It was an easy read because
it was so absurdly interesting to me. Here are my ranked statements from most accurately
expressed statements to least most accurately statements:
- Within groups, people may engage in conduct that
is wilder, stranger, or more uncivilized than their usual behavior when alone.
- Even in their later years, people may have
trouble forgiving themselves for bad things they did when they were young.
- When dealing with an adult, even a helpless one,
children may have in their minds images of parental authority that affect how
they treat a person.
- Children may have difficultly sharing the
perspective of another person.
- People need to see one another’s faces if they
are to trust one another.
- Children may fail to understand when an adult is
in danger.
- Children are capable of conspiring with one another
against the adult world.
- The psychological reality of children and adults
is a deep well within themselves that they cannot see into.
- We should be more compassionate toward people
who are trapped.
- People
project their fears or suspicions onto others, even those who do not actually
pose a threat to them.
“Within groups, people may engage
in conduct that is wilder, stranger, or more uncivilized than their usual
behavior when alone;” this initially caught my eye because I believe that is
expresses Sher’s theme perfectly. For example, say one little girl was walking
through an open field and heard a man yelping for help. This little girl would
most likely go find a more authoritative figure to aid to this man. I am only saying
this because I do not know many children/people who would walk by a person in
need of help and not actually do anything about it. Right now I am currently
enrolled in Introduction to Psychology and one of the worksheets my professor
handed out was titled “A Survey of Psychological Beliefs.” One of the beliefs
was that “if you need help from a bystander, you are more likely to receive it
if only a few people are nearby.” This quote was a proven study which helps
explicate this statement even further.
Next, I ranked “even in their
later years, people may have trouble forgiving themselves for bad things they
did when they were young” number two because that is just simply how humans
live. No one lives without any regrets and if they do then they’re lying. The
last short paragraph in “The Man in the Well” is a perfect example of this
statement. “After that we didn’t play by the well anymore; even when we were
much older, we didn’t go back. I will never go back.” (Lines 62-65) This quote
signifies that the persona of who is telling the story felt troubled about what
had happened is his past.
“When dealing with an adult, even
a helpless one, children may have in their minds images of parental authority
that affect how they treat a person” is ranked number three because some
children may not want to help adults because of their home life. Some parents may be abusive and violent in
their homes which would make such children more skeptical about other adults. Perhaps
many parents have scarred their children which would then make the impression
that all parents act like their own. Mentioned in the story, the persona’s parents
are mentioned every once in a while; the mother always seems to be crying when
the persona mentions her on the night that it rained. Do the mother’s tears
symbolize a deeper meaning within the thesis?
“Children may have difficulties
sharing the perspective of another person” is ranked number four on my list
because in all simplicity, kids are kids. Depending on how old they are, they don’t
even know how to think about themselves unless they’re hungry, tired, or have
to use the bathroom. Children simply don’t have the mature mind-set that older
people have because they most likely haven’t experienced life changes yet.
Although, yes, Sher does explain through the narrator that he/she “watched the
shudder move from face to face,” (lines 42-43) but this does not justify understanding
a perspective of someone.
The statement, “people need to see
one another’s faces if they are to trust one another” is in the middle of the
ranking because, although it is considered “judging a book by its cover,” people
tend to believe the mentality of “seeing is believing.” (Blind people are an
exception to my chosen statement #5.) I would say that children are more likely
to tryst someone by seeing their face, not from looking down a pitch black
well. The children in the story want to know what the man’s characteristics are
and what his name is so they can most likely be able to trust him. Who trusts
someone when they can’t see them and when they won’t tell what their name is
anyway?
“Children may fail to understand
when an adult is in danger” is an obvious statement. Kids typically think that
mommy and daddy are super heroes and that they’re never in trouble. The
children in “The Man in the Well” let this helpless man die in a well, never
once seeking any type of help for him because they must not understand that
this adult is in crucial danger.
The statement “the psychological
reality of children and adults is a deep well within themselves that they
cannot see into” is voted toward the end because I think parents know the
psychological reality about themselves, it is the kids who do not. This
statement is just not the best thesis statement to explain Sher’s story.
The statement “we should be more compassionate
toward people who are trapped” is towards the end of accurate thesis statements
solely because of the word “trapped.” I was unsure of how trapped was being
used in the context. If trapped was taken literally, as if being trapped in a
well or if the word trapped had a deeper symbolic meaning.
Finally, the statement that is
least accurately expressing the main idea of “The Man in the Well” is “people
project their fears or suspicions onto others, even those who do not actually
pose a threat to them.” This statement honestly just confused me which is why I
ranked it last. At first I thought I understood it, so I ranked it right in the
middle at number five, but after revising my paper I grew confused of the
statement’s context and had to make an adjustment. Thus, this statement is last
because I feel it does not relate to the previously read short story.